![intellij collapsing indirection intellij collapsing indirection](https://i.stack.imgur.com/lBmgf.gif)
- #INTELLIJ COLLAPSING INDIRECTION GENERATOR#
- #INTELLIJ COLLAPSING INDIRECTION UPDATE#
- #INTELLIJ COLLAPSING INDIRECTION PRO#
- #INTELLIJ COLLAPSING INDIRECTION SOFTWARE#
- #INTELLIJ COLLAPSING INDIRECTION PC#
It is being called "using an example" or "illustrative example". > Great, so you bought an different type of RAM in a completely different form factor and paid a different price. So that’s almost 50 million pixels displayed on around 4,000 square inches of screens driven by a single MBP laptop. TB#4 - TB3TB2 adapter, then 27” Apple Thunderbolt Display 2560x1440 TB#3 - eGPU with AMD RX580, then two 34” ultrawides connected over HDMI 3440x1440, two 27” DisplayPort monitors 2560x1440 TB#2 - TB3TB2 adapter, then two 27” Apple Thunderbolt Displays 2560x1440 I don’t use the setup actively, did it as a test, but it very much works.
![intellij collapsing indirection intellij collapsing indirection](https://res.cloudinary.com/practicaldev/image/fetch/s--TUtKZAtr--/c_imagga_scale,f_auto,fl_progressive,h_420,q_auto,w_1000/https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/i/vgwcdsakdmivjd25u7rw.png)
I’ve connected eight external monitors to my 16” MBP (with laptop screen still enabled, so 9 screens total).
#INTELLIJ COLLAPSING INDIRECTION PRO#
The reason I still have a cheese grater Mac Pro desktop at all is because I have 128gb RAM in it and have tasks that need that much memory. Your video card doesn’t care if you have a 40” 4K monitor or an 80” 4K monitor, to it, it’s the same load. Also, the physical size of the monitor is irrelevant, it’s the resolution that matters. Those requirements don’t dictate a desktop. > The reason for developing on a desktop is that my productivity is much higher with 3 screens
#INTELLIJ COLLAPSING INDIRECTION SOFTWARE#
After all, Macs are "just Intel PC's inside!" so if Windows runs worse, clearly that's a fault of bad software rather than subtly crippled hardware Both a "minimum viable engineering effort" and a subtle way to simply make Windows seem "worse" by showing it performing worse on a (forgive the pun) "Apples to Apples" configuration. The absolute, crushing cynic in me has always felt that this was a series of intentional steps. Hard disk in IDE mode only, not SATA! Unless you booted up OS X and ran some dd commands on the partition table to "trick" it into running as a SATA mode disk Building Gentoo in a VM got the system up to a recorded 117 degrees Celsius in Speccy! Only the hot and power hungry AMD GPU is exposed and enabled I want to say 2012 or 2013?) some of the features "missing" in Bootcamp
![intellij collapsing indirection intellij collapsing indirection](https://res.cloudinary.com/practicaldev/image/fetch/s--aYr6a8ss--/c_limit%2Cf_auto%2Cfl_progressive%2Cq_auto%2Cw_880/https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/01p0d6p5b4k4b1chmt9n.png)
The last time I used it (the last MBP with Ethernet built in. At least in my experience, Bootcamp seemed almost designed to cripple Windows by contrast to OS X
#INTELLIJ COLLAPSING INDIRECTION PC#
It'll be fantastic and it's exciting to see the return of more experimentation in silicon, but at the same time it was a nice dream for a decade or so to be able to freely take advantage of a range of hardware the PC market offered which filled holes Apple couldn't. So I'm a bit pessimistic/whistful about that particular area, even though it'll be a long time before the axe completely falls on it. I'm sure Apple Silicon will be great for a range of systems, but it won't help in areas that Apple just organizationally doesn't care about/doesn't have the bandwidth for because that's not a technology problem. The hackintosh, particularly virtualized ones in my opinion (running macOS under ESXi deals with a ton of the regular problem spots), has helped fill that hole as frankenstein MP 2010s finally hit their limits. Then they did a kind of sort of ok update, but at a bad point given that Intel was collapsing, and forcing in some of their consumer design in ways that really hurt the value.
#INTELLIJ COLLAPSING INDIRECTION UPDATE#
And it was complete shit, and to zero surprise never got a single update (since they totally fucked the power/thermal envelope, there was nowhere to go) and users completely lost the ability to make up for that. The prices did steadily inch upward, but far more critically sometime between 20 somebody at Apple decided the MP had to be exciting or something and created the Mac Cube 2, except this time to force it by eliminating the MP entirely. There didn't need to be anything exciting about them. At one point they had quite competitive PowerMacs and then Mac Pros covering the range of $2k all the way up to $10k+, and while sure there was some premium there was feature coverage, and they got regular yearly updates.
![intellij collapsing indirection intellij collapsing indirection](https://miro.medium.com/max/2816/1*5Xpkie7bWs5cPVQKjxoCng.gif)
#INTELLIJ COLLAPSING INDIRECTION GENERATOR#
I think a major generator of interest in hackintoshes has been that there are significant segments of computing that Apple has simply completely (or nearly completely) given up on, including essentially any non-AIO desktop system above the Mini. I have zero issues with an Apple premium or paying a lot for hardware. > Given that Hackintoshers are a particular bunch who don’t take kindly to the Apple-tax Not to speak for anyone else, but one thing I gently disagree with: